<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Medal Count,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 8pt;"><em>by Chris Bodenner</em></span></p> <p>A reader writes:</p> <blockquote> <p>Expanding on the <a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/08/the-medal-count-ctd-3.html" target="_self">reader&#39;s point</a> comparing US and EU medal counts - because of the way that qualifying for events is limited by country, the EU was able to send over 3800 athletes to the Olympics. This means the EU averaged about 0.07 medals per athlete. The USA was allowed to send 543 athletes, which means they averaged 0.19 medals per athlete, or <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/2012/athletes" target="_self">almost three times as many as the EU</a>. There is no way to say that US would have beaten out the EU if they had been able to send seven times as many atheletes as they actually did, but given that there is an element of chance to all sporting events, just the presence of more athletes from one country will increase the overall medal count for that country.&#0160; (As an aside, the host country sent more athletes than the US - 558 from Great Britain).</p> </blockquote> <p>Another writes:</p> <blockquote> <p>I cannot believe you haven’t considered medal count in relation to the population of the competing countries. (Being from Denmark, I take great pride in that type of comparison.) You can see from <a href="http://simon.forsyth.net/olympics.html" target="_self">this link</a> that the picture changes radically.</p> </blockquote> <p>The US is 28th by that standard. Another reader:</p>]]></html></oembed>