<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Why Study Ayn&nbsp;Rand?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Alan Wolfe <a href="http://chronicle.com/blogs/conversation/2012/08/19/the-ridiculous-rise-of-ayn-rand/?cid=at&amp;utm_source=at&amp;utm_medium=en" target="_self">provides</a> the unflattering reason:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In the academy, she is a nonperson. Her theories are works of  fiction. Her works of fiction are theories, and bad ones at that. Should  the Republicans actually win in 2012, we might need to study her in the  academic world. It would be for the same reason we sometimes need to  study creationism.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>