<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[A Model Of&nbsp;Restraint]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Bernard Avishai <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/28/who-is-philip-roth-s-portnoy-satirizing.html" target="_self">revisits</a> Philip Roth&#39;s classic Bildungsroman of sexual neuroses, <em>Portnoy&#39;s Complaint</em>. He finds a lesson about how easily we fall prey to human desires:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Jews  presumed to control themselves so well—partly because they had been a  scorned minority and had learned to ingratiate themselves—but also  because they had a religious culture that could seem an endless  restraining order. Portnoy knew better. He had seemed to come around to  something like D.H. Lawrence’s rebellion against the confinements latent  in this curiously Ben Franklinish culture: </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> What  else, I ask you, were all those prohibitive dietary rules and  regulations all about to begin with, what else but to give us little  Jewish children practice in being repressed? Practice, darling,  practice, practice, practice &#8230; Why else the two sets of dishes? Why  else the kosher soap and salt? Why else, I ask you, but to remind us  three times a day that life is boundaries and restrictions if it’s  anything, hundreds of thousands of little rules laid down by none other  than None Other &#8230;</p>
<p>Thus,  the American embodiment of self-restraint cannot restrain himself, at  least not in private, where lovers and analysts learn the truth. And if a  Jew can’t hold it all together, then surely Everyman can’t. </p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>