<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Living As We&nbsp;Choose]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>At the <em>BBC News</em> magazine, John Gray <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19372177" target="_self">provides</a> a primer on the meaning of freedom. In particular, he looks to an older generation of political thinkers &#8211; Bertrand Russell, and, further back, John Stuart Mill &#8211; who grasped the way democratic rule can encroach on a free life:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Where this older generation differed from many today is that they  thought of freedom as a lack of restriction on how we can act. Being  free meant simply the absence of obstacles to living as we choose. While  it&#39;s a view that&#39;s been criticised because it seems to see individuals  as being separate from society, it seems to me to capture better than  any other what freedom means and why it&#39;s important for every human  being. </p>
<p>We need freedom because our goals and values are highly  diverse and often quite different from those of the people around us.  Having a voice in collective decisions &#8211; the basis of democracy &#8211; is a  fine thing, but it won&#39;t protect your freedom if the majority is hostile  to the way you choose to live.  </p>
<p>Many will tell you that this danger can be dealt with by  bills of rights that put some freedoms beyond the range of political  interference. But politics has a habit of finding ways around the law,  and when the state is weak declarations of rights tend to be  unenforceable.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>