<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[&#8220;Why Not Have Blind Debate Coverage?&#8221;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Nyhan <a href="http://www.cjr.org/swing_states_project/how_to_avoid_pack_journalism_at_debates.php?page=all" target="_self">urges</a> journalists to come to their own conclusions about tonight&#39;s debate:</p> <blockquote> <p>For the next three presidential debates, send one of your reporters to a room with a TV and no Internet access and have him or her file a story on the debate before seeing anyone else’s take. I bet these accounts would frequently reach different conclusions from media hive mind. (I’m going to try this myself by staying off Twitter for the duration.)</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>