<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Parody Of The&nbsp;Day]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Karl Sharro <a href="http://karlremarks.blogspot.com/2012/10/slavoj-zizek-romney-big-bird-and.html" target="_self">pens</a> a brilliant one for Slavoj Žižek, &quot;<a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/06/the-borat-of-philosophy-.html" target="_self">The Borat of Philosophy</a>&quot;. Here is fake Žižek analyzing the first presidential debate:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The bourgeois media and the Democratic party machine were confounded by Mitt Romney’s invocation of Big Bird during the first US presidential debate, a sentiment that soon gave way to cynical amusement and playground mockery. But Romney had inadvertently revealed a deep truth about the Capitalist canon’s troubled relationship with oversized birds. Birds at once represent freedom, a visual cliché widely used by Liberal parties around the world depicting a bird in flight, never in repose, and the possibility of being devoured by the feathered creatures that have learned to negotiate gravity far better than un-mechanised humans could ever do. Romney’s Big Bird metaphor deserves more analysis than it was given by the mainstream media arm of the post-wage capitalist complex.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>