<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Dem Half Of The Grand&nbsp;Bargain]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Anticipating the coming fiscal cliff negotiations, Jared Bernstein <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/remember-weve-already-cut-a-bunch-of-spending/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JaredBernstein+%28Jared+Bernstein%29">points out</a> something important:&#0160;</p>
<blockquote>
<p>When writing about a balanced approach to fiscal policy, one that involves both spending cuts and new revenues, it should be noted that Congress and the President have actually <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/weve-actually-already-cut-a-bunch-of-spending/">already cut</a> $1.5 trillion ($1.7t including interest savings) in discretionary spending, not including war costs, over the next decade.</p>
<p>That’s 70% of the Simpson-Bowles discretionary spending cuts! Without that point, I suspect many readers will think we need to start with spending cuts and then we’ll talk taxes. But … a big start on the spending cuts has already materialized … so it’s tax revenue time, right?</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>