<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Endorsing Divided Government]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Both&#0160;<a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/11/case-romney.html" target="_self">David Frum</a> and <a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/11/how-would-romney-govern.html" target="_self">Justin Green</a> endorsed Romney, in part, because they expect a Democratic Senate to keep him in check. Ezra Klein <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/11/05/first-assume-a-democratic-senate/?wprss=rss_ezra-klein">rejects</a> this sort of reasoning:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Democrats might lose the Senate [today]. If they don’t, they might lose it in 2014. Or 2016, when President Romney is reelected atop a booming economy, and right before the unexpected retirement of one of the liberal members of the Supreme Court. What happens then? Are the endorsements void? It’s a strange kind of endorsement that only works as long as the presidential candidate being endorsed isn’t able to govern alongside members of his own party. More to the point, it’s a self-nullifying kind of endorsement.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>