<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Waiting For An&nbsp;Eisenhower]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p> <img class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451c45669e2017d3da76957970c" style="width: 515px;" title="Moderation" src="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/6a00d83451c45669e2017d3da76957970c-550wi.png" alt="Moderation" /></p>
<p>Seth Masket <a href="http://mischiefsoffaction.blogspot.com/2012/11/moderation-in-progress.html?m=0">posts</a> the above chart from <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Party-Decides-Presidential-Nominations-American/dp/0226112373" target="_self">The Party Decides</a></em>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[T]he longer a party is deprived control of the White House, the more moderate its presidential nominees become. One term out of office may be a fluke, but two terms is serious, and three is catastrophic. Parties take this seriously and tend to nominate considerably more centrist people, sacrificing a significant chunk of their governing agenda for a chance of actually governing.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That assumes a party hasn&#8217;t jumped the shark and become a populist-religious movement more concerned with purity than power. But maybe that&#8217;s just part of a transitory phase as well. But here&#8217;s hoping we have a credible GOP by the time the Obama wave subsides. A country needs two sane parties, not just one.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/6a00d83451c45669e2017d3da76957970c-550wi.png?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[301]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>