<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Walmart Strike,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[Kathleen Geier <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_11/the_black_friday_worker_action041373.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+washingtonmonthly%2Frss+%28Political+Animal+at+Washington+Monthly%29">calls</a>&#0160;the strikes a &quot;a rousing success.&quot; McArdle <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/23/unions-organize-walmart-protests-rest-of-the-nation-goes-shopping.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Farticles+%28The+Daily+Beast+-+Latest+Articles%29">disagrees</a>. Among the reasons she expects them to do little good:</p> <blockquote> <p>Walmart&#39;s $446 billion of revenue last year was eye-popping, but its profit margins are far from fat--between 3% to 3.5%.  If they cut that down by a percentage point--about what retailers like Costco and Macy&#39;s have been bringing in--that would give each Walmart employee about $2850 a year, which is substantial but far from life-changing.  Further wage improvements would have to come out of the pockets of Walmart&#39;s extremely price conscious shoppers.  Which might be difficult, given how many product categories Amazon is pushing into.</p> </blockquote> <p>Earlier coverage <a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/11/the-walmart-strike.html" target="_self">here</a>. Update from a reader:</p> <blockquote> <p>Is Megan McArdle really as out of touch as she sounds?  This is truly frightening in its upper-class cluelessness.</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>