<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s Creepy Emails,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>They were <a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/05/obamas-creepy-emails-and-ads.html" target="_self">obnoxious</a> but they worked, raising <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-29/the-science-behind-those-obama-campaign-e-mails" target="_self">$690 million</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The appeals were the product of rigorous experimentation by a large team of analysts. &quot;We did extensive A-B testing not just on the subject lines and the amount of money we would ask people for,&quot; says Amelia Showalter, director of digital analytics, &quot;but on the messages themselves and even the formatting.&quot; The campaign would test multiple drafts and subject lines—often as many as 18 variations—before picking a winner to blast out to tens of millions of subscribers. &#8230;</p>
<p>It quickly became clear that a casual tone was usually most effective. &quot;The subject lines that worked best were things you might see in your in-box from other people,” Fallsgraff says. &quot; &#39;Hey&#39; was probably the best one we had over the duration.&quot; Another blockbuster in June simply read, &quot;I will be outspent.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Propublica <a href="http://projects.propublica.org/emails/campaigns/barack-obama" target="_self">archived</a> many of the messages and their variants.</p>
]]></html></oembed>