<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Philosophical Self-Impovement]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Riffing on the work of the French thinker <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Philosophy-Way-Life-Spiritual-Exercises/dp/0631180338/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1354644810&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=philosophy+as+a+way+of+life" target="_self">Pierre Hadot</a>, and reviewing a number of recent biographies about philosophers, Costica Bradatan <a href="http://lareviewofbooks.org/article.php?id=1166&amp;fulltext=1" target="_self">channels</a> an older, half-forgotten approach to philosophy &#8211; that it is a &#8220;way of life&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote>
<p> In this understanding of the Western tradition, the chief reason for  studying philosophy is not a desire to know more about the world, but a  profound sense of dissatisfaction with the state in which one finds  oneself at a given moment. One day you suddenly, painfully realize that  something important is missing in your life, that there is a gap between  what you currently are and the sense of what you could be. And before  you know it, this emptiness starts eating at you. In a way, you don’t  even exist yet. (It must have been in this sense that Socrates used the  term “midwifery” for what he was doing; by subjecting those around him  to the rigors of his philosophy, he was bringing them into existence  properly.) Philosophy thus presupposes a certain degree of  self-detestation. It may well be that philosophizing begins in shame. If  you are a bit too comfortable with yourself, if there is nothing you  are ashamed of, you don’t need philosophy; you are fine as you are.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>