<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Please Pretend To Turn Off All Electronic&nbsp;Devices]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Babbage <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2012/12/radio-interference" target="_self">reveals</a> a major reason why flight attendants have to nag you about it during takeoff and landing:</p> <blockquote> <p>The problem is that the current [FAA] guidelines require  each airline to test every make and model of each gizmo it wants the FAA  to approve for use on its flights—and then to do the same for every  type of aircraft in its fleet. The airlines have baulked at such a  monumental task because of the cost. The FAA is now looking for ways to  bring airlines, aircraft manufacturers, electronics makers and other  interested parties together to streamline the certification process at  least for tablets, e-readers, game machines and a few other popular  gadgets.</p> <p>But do not expect such easing to extend to phones. One  reason is that, with the enormous number of makes and models in  existence, getting all mobiles approved for use on board aircraft would  be prohibitively expensive. Another is that the ground-based  interference problem has still to be resolved.</p> </blockquote> <p>The head of the FCC has even <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/3003778/fcc-tells-faa-allow-more-electronic-devices-planes?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+fastcompany%2Fheadlines+%28Fast+Company%29" target="_self">urged</a> the FAA to allow more portable devices. Meanwhile, flight crews are exempt from the restrictions:</p>]]></html></oembed>