<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Patronizing Sex Workers]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
</p>
<p>Laurie Penny <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2012/12/strange-neo-victorian-desire-save-prostitutes-and-porn-actresses" target="_self">criticizes</a> the current campaign to regulate sex trafficking, despite the crusaders&#39; &quot;good intentions&quot;:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Laws regulating  sex work are written, in most cases, by people who have never done sex  work and who have no sustained contact with those who do. The most  well-meaning legislation, designed to prevent the trafficking of  vulnerable women and girls (vulnerable men and boys are expected to fend  for themselves), often backfires, pushing the sex trade further  underground and giving the police licence to punish and victimise women  walking the streets or working together for safety. In the UK earlier  this year, a cancer patient, Sheila Farmer, overturned a conviction for  &quot;brothel-keeping&quot; &#8211; she was selling sex in a flat shared with a friend  for their mutual protection.</p>
<p>In California, the controversial Proposition 35 has just passed, with  the aim, again, of stamping out sex trafficking. As a result, women who  are found to be selling sex may have to register as sex offenders and  submit to internet monitoring for the rest of their lives, as may anyone  receiving financial support from them, including their children.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>She concludes, &quot;In reality,<strong> </strong>sex work isn’t stigmatised because it is dangerous. Sex work is dangerous because it is stigmatised.&quot;</p>
]]></html></oembed>