<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Silent Reading Time]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>First, a cool visualization showing how much languages involve silent letters:</p>
<div class="embed-vimeo" style="text-align: center;"><iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/39114742" width="0" height="0" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<p>Meanwhile, scientists <a href="http://scientopia.org/blogs/scicurious/2013/01/23/silent-reading-isnt-so-silent-at-least-not-to-your-brain/" target="_self">have shown</a> that even when we are reading silently to ourselves, our brains are still hearing:</p>
<blockquote><p>What&#8217;s particularly new about this study is that it not only shows that silent reading causes high-frequency electrical activity in auditory areas, but it shows that these areas as specific to voices <em>speaking a language</em>. This activity was only present when the person was paying attention to the task. The authors believe that these results back up the hypothesis that we all produce an &#8220;inner voice&#8221; when reading silently. And it is enhanced by attention, suggesting that it&#8217;s probably not an automatic process, but something that occurs when we attentively process what we are reading. And the next time you read silently, remember that it&#8217;s not quite to silent to your brain.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>