<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Printing Your Own Handgun,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='360' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/tAW72Y_XPF4?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;autohide=2&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span>
<p>Kelsey Atherton <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-02/watch-guy-fire-600-rounds-partially-3-d-printed-gun">explains</a> the significance of the above video:</p>
<blockquote><p>The agents provocateur at Defense Distributed welcomed Congress back from recess by releasing a video of a brand new 3-D printed AR-15 receiver being used to fire multiple 100-round magazines. &#8230; The last time we saw Defense Distributed test a 3-D printed lower receiver, it <a href="http://defdist.tumblr.com/post/37023487585/printed-reinforced-ar-lower-review">broke after 6 shots</a>. The latest video shows that it can survive a whopping 600 shots. <a href="http://defdist.tumblr.com/post/44004294495/defense-distributed-welcomes-congress-back-from">This suggests</a> that Defense Distributed has made significant progress toward its goal of building a working 3-D printed gun.</p></blockquote>
<p>Defense Distributed is the group behind the <a href="http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2012/10/04/printing-your-own-handgun/">Wiki Weapon Project</a>, the goal of which is to produce an open-source 3-D printed gun that anyone could make with a 3-D printing machine. Last week, Robert Beckhusen <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/02/gunpowder-regulation/">identified</a> one way to control guns once 3-D printed guns become a real possibility:</p>
<p><!--tpmore --></p>
<blockquote><p>“Perhaps the only way forward, if we choose to try and control this, is to control the gunpowder — the explosives — and not the actual device,” Hod Lipson, a Cornell University professor of engineering and an early pioneer of 3-D printing, tells Danger Room. The reason, Lipson says, is that it would be the remaining “controlled substance” in a field that’s otherwise uncontrollable, regardless of the shape or size of the firearm that you’re using — or printing. It is the “unifying material everybody would need, and it would be a good target for regulation if people choose to regulate it.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Beckhusen also wonders about the safety of the hobbyists:</p>
<blockquote><p>It’s a question whether freely shared blueprints, modified with anonymity — and with zero oversight and regulation — can be truly made safe for the user. Sharing faulty blueprints could also make for a dangerous kind of trolling.</p></blockquote>
<p>Previous Dish on printed guns <a href="http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2012/10/04/printing-your-own-handgun/">here</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>