<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Your Cell Phone Still Won&#8217;t Kill&nbsp;You]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Following a dubious new <a href="http://www.bioinitiative.org/media/press-releases/">report</a> on the health risks of wifi, Keith Kloor <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/collideascape/?p=10578#.US50Hxn9Umx">decries</a> the media&#8217;s ongoing flirtation with the &#8220;technology-causes-sickness&#8221; trope, which often not only ignores or distorts science but can actually bring about a negative psychosomatic effect:</p>
<blockquote><p>[R]esearchers used a BBC documentary on the alleged dangers and health effects of electromagnetic fields. Participants watching the documentary–who were led to believe they were being closely exposed to a WiFi signal (they weren’t)–exhibited symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields. (I’ve previously <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/collideascape/2013/02/08/the-logical-extension-of-wind-turbine-syndrome/#.US4XMY4-R7E" target="_blank">discussed</a> this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/opinion/sunday/beware-the-nocebo-effect.html?_r=0" target="_blank">Nocebo</a> effect with respect to <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/10/23/nocebo-doubt-about-it-wind-turbine-syndrome-is-catching/" target="_blank">Wind Turbine Syndrome</a>.) Those most symptomatic were also found to have pre-existing anxieties and sensitivities that made them more susceptible.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>