<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Understanding Literature]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Critic and literary historian D. G. Myers <a href="http://dgmyers.blogspot.com/2013/04/what-became-of-literary-history.html">observes</a> a paradox:</p>
<blockquote><p>The secret to understanding literature—any literature—is wide reading and long experience, which leaves the beginner practically worthless as a critic. Yet the only method for understanding literature is to read it as a critic—closely, that is, without any preconceptions. Perhaps the only exit from this paradox is to read literary history, which almost no one does anymore. Which is a tragedy and a surprise, since we live in a happy era for literary history&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>His proposed syllabus is <a href="http://dgmyers.blogspot.com/2013/04/what-became-of-literary-history.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>