<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[What&#8217;s The Right Way To Regulate&nbsp;Reefer?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Room For Debate <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/05/22/how-can-marijuana-be-sold-safely">tackles</a> the question. Garrett Peck <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/05/22/how-can-marijuana-be-sold-safely/for-marijuana-legalization-lessons-from-prohibition">ponders</a> marijuana taxes:</p>
<blockquote><p>The nation&#8217;s powerful alcohol lobbies have managed to rebuff any federal alcohol excise tax increase, last raised in 1991. States should be on the lookout for what will inevitably happen: the marijuana industry will go along with taxation as part of the grand bargain for legalization – just as the alcohol industry did in the 1930s – and then over time change its position to be anti-tax. They will claim that taxes are bad for business and bad for consumers, neither of which is true, given that products like alcohol, gasoline, marijuana and tobacco have a fairly inelastic demand. Here’s a bit of advice to states: index marijuana taxes to inflation, and you will avoid a lot of big debates over raising taxes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Among other suggestions, Kleiman <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/05/22/how-can-marijuana-be-sold-safely/how-to-regulate-marijuana-and-how-not-to">recommends</a> a strict advertising rules:</p>
<blockquote><p>Don’t allow marketing. The legal marijuana industry, like the alcohol, tobacco and gambling industries, will have a financial interest directly opposite to the public interest. Responsible use is the goal, but dependent use generates sales volume. A public monopoly would probably work best; short of that, tight limits on advertising (the Supreme Court permitting) and keeping the industry fragmented to minimize its lobbying power might limit some of the damage.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>