<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[What Poetry Can Learn From Pop&nbsp;Music]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Tasha Golden <a href="http://blog.pshares.org/index.php/why-poetry-cant-find-its-public/">points out</a> that &#8220;pop music loves the public&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>In Poetry Land there’s a myth that art is tainted by popularity: the more eyes see it, the more corrupt it becomes. Said myth is outdated and nonsensical, but survives because it’s a nice stunt double for artistic integrity. It’s also great for cognitive dissonance: if no one’s reading poetry, it helps to think we never wanted them to. AND it justifies our laziness in connecting with non-poets. Hooray!</p>
<p>But um… The myth is rank, you guys. It creates disdain for the public, shames us for our desires to communicate, and imprisons us in Insular Poetry Land&#8230; Pop music has an audience in part because it <em>wants</em> one. It appreciates, respects, and engages the public. We should, too.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>