<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Quotes For The&nbsp;Day]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is time for the world’s major central banks to acknowledge that a sudden burst of moderate inflation would be extremely helpful in unwinding today’s epic debt morass &#8230; Moderate inflation in the short run – say, 6% for two years – would not clear the books. But it would significantly ameliorate the problems, making other steps less costly and more effective,&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;austerian&#8221; <a href="http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/2013.05.26/1507.html" target="_blank">Kenneth Rogoff</a>, 2008. </p>
<p>&#8220;Larry Ball makes the case that we would be a lot better off with a 4 percent inflation target rather than the 2 percent that is now central bank orthodoxy. Intellectually, this position is hardly outlandish; indeed, Ball’s case is very similar to the case Olivier Blanchard made three years ago, just stated more forcefully and with more evidence,&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;anti-austerian&#8221; <a href="http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/2013.05.26/1507.html" target="_blank">Paul Krugman</a>, last week.</p>
<p>More discussion <a href="http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/2013.05.26/1507.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>