<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Tracy R. Walsh]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/tracyrwalsh/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Slanting To The&nbsp;Right]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<h6>by Tracy R. Walsh</h6>
<p>Michael Brick <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/08/conservatives-rally-to-defend-fancy-handwriting.html">finds</a> that many conservatives have rallied around cursive instruction:</p>
<blockquote><p>The defense of cursive is not a strictly partisan issue &#8230; but the balance of enthusiasm does seem to tip rightward. Intrigued by the politics of handwriting pedagogy, I called Morgan Polikoff, an education-policy expert at the University of Southern California who has prominently endorsed a shift away from cursive instruction, to ask about his hate mail. “When I get hate mail – hate e-mail – about cursive, it’s mostly from conservatives,” he told me. “The hate mail I get from liberals is that we’ve decimated the curriculum and there’s no more beauty in schooling. &#8230; The argument you get from conservatives is more ‘How are we going to be able to read the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence?’”</p></blockquote>
<p>More Dish on cursive instruction <a href="http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/threads/should-we-kill-cursive/">here</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>