<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Patrick Appel]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/dishpatrick/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Who Will Become The Face Of The&nbsp;GOP?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<h6>by Patrick Appel</h6>
<p>Beinart <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/26/marco-rubio-the-real-threat-in-2016-has-been-eclipsed-by-ted-cruz.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Flatest+%28The+Daily+Beast+-+Latest%29">feels</a> that Ted Cruz is gaining steam:</p>
<blockquote><p>Cruz is eclipsing Rubio, it’s worth recalling, at a time when the American people’s biggest complaints about the GOP are that it’s “<a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/161573/americans-top-critique-gop-unwilling-compromise.aspx" target="_blank">too unwilling to compromise</a>” and “too extreme.” (<a href="http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/02-26-13%20Party%20Images%20Releases.pdf" target="_blank">PDF</a>) Were the Republican Party’s shrinking cohort of right-wing activists not sheltered from the rest of America by the informational cocoon Fox News has built for them, they would see in Rubio’s immigration work a politician struggling, not always coherently but with a degree of humility and good will, to show younger, poorer, newer, less white Americans that the GOP gives a damn about them. They might also realize that this kind of inclusive gesture, combined with Rubio’s natural charisma, offers the chance to partially undo the GOP’s reputation as a party beholden to blue bloods and bigots. Instead, they’ve discarded Rubio in favor of Cruz, a man who combines Sarah Palin’s worldview, Richard Nixon’s commitment to fair play, and Al Gore’s folksy charm.</p></blockquote>
<p>Enten <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/24/republicans-are-not-all-extreme">focuses</a>, instead, on Christie, who he dubs the establishment candidate. He sees elite support for Christie as evidence that the GOP hasn&#8217;t completely lost its mind:<!--tpmore --></p>
<blockquote><p>Christie&#8217;s scoring on the two rankings we have available place him more toward the center than any other candidate to win a Republican nomination since 1964. Some of you might say that Christie is more conservative than these scores indicate. But it seems to me that for every issue where Christie takes a conservative stand, he takes a moderate stance. So that while he&#8217;s conservative on taxes, he&#8217;s for campaign finance reform and green energy.</p>
<p>The point is he&#8217;s more toward the center than previous nominees. He no doubt will move somewhat towards the right, once he wins a second term in November. Still, even a hard turn right would still leave him as relatively moderate. A Republican leadership that was looking to move more towards the right would not be interested in nominating this man or nominating the committee chairmen they are in congress. This is a party that wants to win. It&#8217;s a party leadership that at least right now is following the historical pattern of <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-X6pdpu1-02o/TnPMQxVmYkI/AAAAAAAACRQ/cb7KziGzVvM/s400/moderation.png">wanting to nominate a more moderate candidate</a>, after losing the the presidential election in two consecutive cycles.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>