<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t Hate On &#8220;Likes&#8221;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>They’re <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/09/18/court-facebook-like-is-protected-by-the-first-amendment/">covered</a> by the Constitution now:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Liking” something on Facebook is a form of speech protected by the First Amendment, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday, reviving a closely watched case over the extent to which the Constitution shields what we do online. In doing so, the Fourth US Circuit Court of Appeals sided with a former deputy sheriff in Hampton, Va., who said he was sacked for “liking” the Facebook page of a man running against his boss for city sheriff. “Liking” the campaign page, <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/169110696/Facebook-4-Th-Circuit">the court said</a>, was the “Internet equivalent of displaying a political sign in one’s front yard, which the Supreme Court has held is substantive speech.”</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>