<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Tough Question Of The&nbsp;Day]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Hard to beat this from <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115689/chuck-schumer-interview-liberal-blogs-elizabeth-warren-ted-cruz" target="_blank">TNR&#8217;s Isaac Chotiner</a> to Senator Chuck Schumer:</p>
<blockquote><p>Are you worried that your old colleague John Kerry has gotten ahead of himself with these <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/11/john-kerry-tells-concerned-senators-to-calm-down-over-iran-sanctions/">Iran negotiations</a>?</p></blockquote>
<p>Seriously. As Schumer is <a href="http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2013/11/25/the-best-of-the-dish-today-105/" target="_blank">spear-heading a sabotage</a> of the negotiations with Iran, and echoing, word for word, the apocalyptic rhetoric of Bibi Netanyahu, he gets a question like that from a Democratic party magazine. Extra special bonus:</p>
<blockquote><p>IC: Kerry had some pretty harsh comments on Israel the other day.</p>
<p>CS: Yeah, I saw that. I thought that was a mistake.</p></blockquote>
<p>This was the mistake: &#8220;Kerry said that Israel’s attachment to its settlements shows that the country is &#8216;perhaps &#8230; not really serious&#8217; about wanting peace.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s worth noting in case you ever thought that TNR&#8217;s protestations that they oppose West Bank settlements aren&#8217;t <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=couric" target="_blank">several courics</a> in weight. And then <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115611/peter-beinart-do-american-jews-live-cocoon-answer-no" target="_blank">another classic TNR twofer</a>: they get a former member of the Israeli National Security Council to attack Peter Beinart, a former editor of the magazine who has dared to question Israel&#8217;s belligerence and intransigence these past years. Beinart&#8217;s sin was to argue that there is a blinkered debate among American Jews about the realities of the Jewish state. The irony of a hatchet-job on him to say that all is well appears lost on them.</p>
<p>There was some thought that Chris Hughes might actually bring some air and oxygen to the magazine&#8217;s relentlessly predictable coverage of the Middle East, when he bought the magazine from Marty Peretz. Ha!</p>
]]></html></oembed>