<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Weighing A Masterpiece]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dish_david.jpg"><img data-attachment-id="233387" data-permalink="https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/?attachment_id=233387" data-orig-file="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dish_david.jpg" data-orig-size="640,617" data-comments-opened="0" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="dish_david" data-image-description="" data-medium-file="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dish_david.jpg?w=300" data-large-file="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dish_david.jpg?w=640" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-233387" src="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dish_david.jpg?w=1024&#038;h=987" alt="dish_david" srcset="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dish_david.jpg 640w, https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dish_david.jpg?w=150&amp;h=145 150w, https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dish_david.jpg?w=300&amp;h=289 300w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px"   /></a></p>
<p><em>David</em> was originally intended for the buttress of the Florence Cathedral. But William E. Wallace <a href="http://www.artnews.com/2014/04/14/how-michelangelo-made-david-into-a-giant/">figures</a> that Michelangelo knew that at a weight of 8.5 tons, devising a proper support system for the sculpture would be &#8220;an impossible task.&#8221; The artist &#8220;realized the impossibility of the job from the earliest moment, even before he began carving the figure,&#8221; insists Wallace. &#8220;This realization, in effect, liberated him&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>Given the familiarity of the <em>David</em>, it is difficult for us to appreciate just how novel it is. Despite many highly regarded precedents in Florentine art for the representation of David, Michelangelo carved a unique work: an oversize, illogically nude figure with almost no identifying attributes. One could hardly imagine a more peculiar means of representing the young shepherd boy of the Bible, nor a more inappropriate figure to adorn the cathedral. I believe David looks as it does because Michelangelo, realizing that it would <em>not</em> be placed on the cathedral buttress, was free to carve a completely original work. And that is precisely what he did.</p></blockquote>
<p>(Photo by <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/gruenemann/521852775/sizes/z/">John W. Schulze</a>)</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dish_david.jpg?w=580&fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[342]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[330]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>