<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Our Cold Civil War Intensifies,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>In a shrewd and worried <a href="http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-18/be-an-ideologue-not-a-partisan" target="_blank">column</a>, Clive Crook thinks Americans&#8217; left/right social and geographic isolation has made productive ideological debate close to impossible and poisonous partisan discourse even worse. He cites a <a href="http://pcl.stanford.edu/research/2012/iyengar-poq-affect-not-ideology.pdf">Stanford study</a> that goes even further:</p>
<blockquote><p>Using data from a variety of sources, we demonstrate that both Republicans and Democrats increasingly dislike, even loathe, their opponents.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--tpmore --></p>
<blockquote><p>We also find that partisan affect is inconsistently (and perhaps artifactually) founded in policy attitudes. The more plausible account lies in the nature of political campaigns; exposure to messages attacking the out-group reinforces partisans’ biased views of their opponents.</p></blockquote>
<p>This makes a bunch of sense when you think about it. What is the primary form of communication to low-information voters? Political ads. What do they do? Intensify contempt for various candidates along stereotypical partisan lines. Rinse and repeat <em>ad nauseam</em>, and cut yourself off from anyone with a different viewpoint, and you have our gridlocked society. And all the Supreme Court seems to do is usher in yet more money to finance yet more of this poison; and all the media seems able to do is reach for ratings by exploiting these emotions.</p>
]]></html></oembed>