<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[28 Strangers vs 600,000&nbsp;DCers]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the measure of this country&#8217;s commitment to democratic self-government. The duly elected officials of Washington DC have been moving ahead with plans to decriminalize possession of marijuana, reducing the current penalties from $1,000 and a one-year jail-sentence to a $25 civil fine and a 60-day jail sentence for public smoking. The latest <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/in-major-shift-dc-voters-strongly-support-legalizing-marijuana/2014/01/15/9fcc6d04-7d6a-11e3-93c1-0e888170b723_story.html" target="_blank">public opinion polls</a> put support for outright legalization in the District at 63 percent:</p>
<blockquote><p>Washingtonians of every age, race and ethnicity — teenagers and seniors, blacks and whites — registered double-digit increases in support of legalization. Even among those who oppose legalization, nearly half support relaxing punishment for marijuana possession to a fine of $100 or less.</p></blockquote>
<p>So you have close to unanimity of the city&#8217;s residents and voters behind the current proposal. But in America &#8211; unlike any other democratic country on the planet &#8211; the voters in Washington DC can simply be over-ruled by a handful of congressmen from other parts of the country on the House Appropriations Committee. And so this condescending douchebag from Maryland <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/25/house-panel-seeks-to-block-washington-marijuana-law/?ref=us" target="_blank">gets to preach to Washingtonians</a> as if we were incapable of running our own lives:</p>
<p><!--tpmore --></p>
<blockquote><p>“Congress has the authority to stop irresponsible actions by local officials, and I am glad we did for the health and safety of children throughout the District,” Representative Andy Harris, the Maryland Republican who proposed the provision, said in a statement.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s all for the children! But wait! The House Committee can only remove <em>funding</em> for implementing any such change in the law; it cannot actually change the law. And the only parts of the new law that require funding for enforcement<a href="http://www.vox.com/2014/6/26/5842464/house-republicans-might-accidentally-legalize-marijuana-in-dc?utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=ezraklein&amp;utm_content=thursday" target="_blank"> are &#8211; yep! -the penalties:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Eliminating the previous criminal penalties &#8230; costs nothing. So by preventing funding for DC&#8217;s decriminalization law, House Republicans could end enforcement for the few penalties that remain. That would leave DC with decriminalization but no ability to enforce civil fines or jail time — something that looks very similar to outright legalization.</p></blockquote>
<p>Somehow I doubt that an act of brazen contempt for democracy will lead to a triumph of democracy. The full House will have to vote on this at some point. But, in the last days of Prohibition, you never know.</p>
<p>Update from a reader on Twitter:</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/sullydish">@sullydish</a> &amp; don&#8217;t forget, they also ban DC from doing needlexchange, which spreads HIV &amp; has caused 1000s of deaths</p>
<p>— Maia Szalavitz (@maiasz) <a href="https://twitter.com/maiasz/statuses/482258760107585537">June 26, 2014</a></p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>