<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Dish Staff]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/thedishstaff/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Science Of&nbsp;Truthiness]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<h6>by <a href="http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/thedishstaff/">Dish Staff</a></h6>
<p>Katy Waldman <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/09/truthiness_research_cognitive_biases_for_simple_clear_conservative_messages.html">delves into it:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Truthiness is “<a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002586.html" target="_blank">truth that comes from the gut, not books</a>,” Colbert said in 2005. &#8230; Scientists who study the phenomenon now also use the term. It humorously captures how, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/06/30/psychology-explains-why-people-are-so-easily-duped/" target="_blank">as cognitive psychologist Eryn Newman put it</a>, “smart, sophisticated people” can go awry on questions of fact. Newman, who works out of the University of California – Irvine, recently uncovered an unsettling precondition for truthiness: The less effort it takes to process a factual claim, the more accurate it seems. When we fluidly and frictionlessly absorb a piece of information, one that perhaps snaps neatly onto our existing belief structures, we are filled with a sense of comfort, familiarity, and trust. The information strikes us as credible, and we are more likely to affirm it – whether or not we should.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>