<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Between Mini And&nbsp;Maxi]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<div class="embed-twitter">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" width="500">
<p>Super trendy in late spring/summer but dropping in the Aug. heat, will the midi skirt see a fall comeback? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PolyData?src=hash">#PolyData</a> <a href="http://t.co/eH1L33YkX2">pic.twitter.com/eH1L33YkX2</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Polyvore (@polyvore) <a href="https://twitter.com/polyvore/status/507670881913413632">September 4, 2014</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<p>Kimberly Chrisman-Campbell <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/09/the-return-of-the-midi-skirt/379543/?single_page=true">reflects</a> on the history of the midi skirt &#8211; the miniskirt&#8217;s more subdued cousin:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ironically, feminism became the midi’s worst enemy; liberated women refused to purchase whole new wardrobes just because fashion magazines told them to. In an October 1970 article titled “Fashion Fascism: The Politics of Midi,” the San Francisco counterculture fashion magazine <em>Rags</em> decried the midi as a capitalist “conspiracy”; in addition to being “cumbersome and matronly” it had “built-in obsolescence.” (How this differentiated it from any other fashion trend, the magazine did not specify.) With inflation on the rise, the midi was an economic encumbrance, too; the longer length required a higher price point.</p>
<p>The warring interests of consumers, retailers, and the fashion press culminated in what <em>Newsweek </em>called “the midi-skirt debacle of 1970.” One midwestern shopkeeper complained in a letter to <em>Women’s Wear Daily</em> in mid-August: “You are doing quite a disservice to the manufacturers and retailers by trying to promote a fashion that the customers are not ready for.” <em>Vogue</em> suffered a 38 percent drop in ad revenue in the first three months of 1971; many of its advertisers had been burned by the backlash. Vreeland was unceremoniously demoted to consulting editor in May, but the damage was done: Consumer confidence in fashion magazines—and the fashion industry in general—was replaced by a rebellious cynicism.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>