<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Mitrailleuse]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://mitrailleuse.net]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[James E. Miller]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://mitrailleuse.net/author/jamesmiller127/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Conservative against the conservative&nbsp;movement]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight:400;">Less than one week to go before the Iowa caucus, and the battle lines are drawn. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">On one side is brash businessman Donald Trump. On the other side is the near-entirety of the professional conservative movement &#8211; the thinkers, marketers, editors, donor-schmoozers, lawyers, consultants, money-bundlers, tax cheats, business shills, and communication hacks who profess allegiance to St. Ronald Reagan.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">As Michael Buffers says: Let’s get ready to rumble!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">Ever since Donald Trump announced his presidential bid last June, he has been walloping the hucksters known as </span><a href="http://www.unz.com/pgottfried/gottfried-vs-derbyshire-not-even-one-cheer-for-conservatism-inc/"><span style="font-weight:400;">Conservatism, Inc</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">. By channeling working class resentment and throwing out the playbook when it comes to </span><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/donald-trump-fec-fundraising-214838"><span style="font-weight:400;">raising money</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;"> and </span><a href="http://nypost.com/2015/08/27/trumps-unconventional-campaign-lacks-fundraiser-pollster-or-media-consultant/"><span style="font-weight:400;">hiring consultants</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">, Trump is turning traditional politics on its head. He isn’t being spoon-fed soundbites; he isn’t begging for cash; he isn’t bending over backwards to appease huge corporations.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">He’s doing something few candidates have done in a long time: Advocating on behalf of the entire national community, rather than a few eggheads and CEOs with bottomless wallets.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">Meanwhile, the high-salaried Republican brain trust is losing its collective head. This was most pronounced in a recent symposium hosted by </span><i><span style="font-weight:400;">National Review</span></i><span style="font-weight:400;"> eloquently titled “</span><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430126/donald-trump-conservatives-oppose-nomination"><span style="font-weight:400;">Against Trump</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">.” Conservative luminaries such as Thomas Sowell, John Podhoretz, and Glenn Beck contributed, lambasting the GOP frontrunner and pontificating on the need for a principled leader in the White House. Their polemics were chock-full of the high-minded ideals and a mastery of vocabulary that would have made William F. Buckley proud.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">But even for such a long, erudite (and <a href="https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/in-clear-violation/">possibly illegal</a>) spread, the message is the same throughout: Trump is not a cerebral conservative, and thus isn’t fit for the office of the presidency.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">Years ago, this kind of concentrated effort to derail a Republican presidential candidate would have been a resounding success. But that’s all changed with Trump. The bedwetting Hayek-lovers in “</span><a href="http://theweek.com/articles/599577/how-obscure-adviser-pat-buchanan-predicted-wild-trump-campaign-1996"><span style="font-weight:400;">tassel-loafers and bow ties</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">” no longer call the shots. A man with </span><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/15/donald-trump-net-worth-10-billion-fec-election"><span style="font-weight:400;">$10 billion</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;"> and a </span><a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump"><span style="font-weight:400;">twitter account</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;"> now runs </span><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/trump-dominated-rivals-on-social-media-in-2015-217280"><span style="font-weight:400;">the show</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">.</span></p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">Conservative brainiacs are at a loss for how to deal with Trump. The usual shibboleths about free enterprise don’t rouse the base. These highbrow highwaymen are learning a tough lesson that wasn’t taught in grad school economics: America’s middle class doesn’t put food on the table by reading 800-page freedom manifestos or worshipping the golden calf of slightly decreased marginal tax rates. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">The conservative intelligentsia can’t swallow <a href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/an-ike-not-a-bush/">the fact</a> that the American people are willing to accept a fair bit of government intervention into their lives for the ability to pay their mortgage. Well-worded tributes to Adam Smith won’t change their mind. Free market ideology is something they see debated on television &#8211; it isn’t how they live.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">And therein lies the rub. The conservative advocacy business is rooted in the realm of ideas. It eschews the idea of a national interest, of a patriotic, America-first approach to affairs. Instead, it champions the ideological capitalist man with cosmopolitan values.  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">The war between the conservative conglomerate and Donald Trump boils down to what David Frum describes </span><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/01/the-alliance-of-the-aggrieved/424764/"><span style="font-weight:400;">as</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">, “a battle between those for whom conservatism is an ideology, and those for whom conservatism is an identity.” The former wants to morph our country into a Milton Friedman lecture. The latter seeks to live as an American and preserve the institutions that have shaped our country over time.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">It would be one thing if the conservative movement had actually produced the outcomes it promised. Had the endless supply of white papers from D.C. think tanks actually kept Washington fiscally responsible or </span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/02/opinion/sunday/the-terms-of-our-surrender.html"><span style="font-weight:400;">halted the march of cultural liberalism</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">, Trump’s one-man show wouldn’t resonate so much. But failure gives way to opportunity. And Trump, being a businessman, is buying trust at a time </span><a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/65927/nothing-we-trust"><span style="font-weight:400;">legitimacy is low</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">, and selling truth when the demand for authenticity is high.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">Conservatism™ will never understand this. By doing the bidding of </span><a href="http://www.firstthings.com/article/2015/06/the-power-elite"><span style="font-weight:400;">big business</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">, it has helped ushered in the double whammy of open immigration and moral relativism that is quite literally </span><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2015/11/deadly-progressivism"><span style="font-weight:400;">killing the lower-middle class</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">. It has alienated the TV </span><a href="http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-03-armey_N.htm"><span style="font-weight:400;">talking dopes</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;"> from the folks they profess to represent. The </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute"><span style="font-weight:400;">million dollar</span></a> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heritage_Foundation"><span style="font-weight:400;">budgets</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">, the highly-paid </span><a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/forbes-profile-reveals-glenn-beck-is-highest-paid-pundit-this-year-at-80-million/"><span style="font-weight:400;">pundits</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">, the generous </span><a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/rubios-financial-disclosure-shows-800000-book-advance/2121256"><span style="font-weight:400;">book deals</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">, the </span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_12/027281.php"><span style="font-weight:400;">rigged popularity</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;"> &#8211; the conservative industry is awash in the kind of moola the proles can only dream about.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">The rise of Trump is a necessary rebuke to the out-of-touch professional conservative class. </span><span style="font-weight:400;">Their failure to preserve the American way of life from progressive influence has brought about what they most feared: A man who could put the entire movement out of business.</span></p>
<p>I, for one, hope he succeeds.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">There are doubts about if Trump could pull off such a feat, however. Some GOP power players may be </span><a href="http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/22/donald-trump-a-little-establishment-doesnt-hurt/"><span style="font-weight:400;">warming</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;"> up to the Donald, and see him as the best bet to win in November. If that happens, we regress back to exactly where we started, with the usual shysters still pocketing huge wads of dough.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">It’s my hope that Trump says, “to hell with these guys,” and continues to go it on his own. The </span><a href="http://takimag.com/article/white_plight_james_miller/print#axzz3y5vwkgS4"><span style="font-weight:400;">neglected part of America</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;"> needs an advocate on the national stage that isn’t beholden to wealthy interests. They need someone who isn’t afraid to call the conservative movement a scam run by cucks who profit off of rubes. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:400;">Trump has the capacity to pull the </span><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE"><span style="font-weight:400;">curtain back on Oz</span></a><span style="font-weight:400;">. He could continue to wake tens of thousands of people up to this organized fraud. The question is: Will he do it?</span></p>
<p><em>(<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr.#/media/File:William_F._Buckley,_Jr._with_President_Reagan_1986.jpg">Image source</a>)</em></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://themitrailleuse.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/william_f-_buckley_jr-_with_president_reagan_1986.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[296]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>