<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[37prime]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://37prime.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Ultra Slacker]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://37prime.wordpress.com/author/iveryam/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a trap, or is&nbsp;it?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>One that is pretty obvious, firstname@apple.com never mentioned the specifics of upcoming Apple product. It has always been:</p>
<ul>
<li>the next iPhone</li>
<li>the next iPad</li>
</ul>
<p>Back in March 2011, I was told about &#8220;the next iPhone&#8221; but not iPhone 5 or iPhone 4S. Just like December 2011 when I was told about &#8220;the next iPad&#8221;.</p>
<p>Apple is that kind of company who would not call the next iPad by the name iPad 3.  Jokingly, I said that Apple should call the next iPad by the name iPad 2x because it features 2x pixel density. Almost everyone expect the next iPad to be called iPad 3. I personally think that Apple could have called it something different.</p>
<p>In addition to all that, firstname@apple.com did mention the double pixel density of the next iPad but never once mentioned &#8220;Retina Display&#8221;. I tend to believe that Apple will not call the next iPad display as &#8220;Retina Display&#8221;; for it is purely a marketing term.</p>
<p>All that I heard about the next iPad were carefully worded, leaving no traceable specifics.</p>
<p>We all will find out what it really is on March 7th, 2012.</p>
		<div id="geo-post-7727" class="geo geo-post" style="display: none">
			<span class="latitude">34.074000</span>
			<span class="longitude">-118.399000</span>
		</div>]]></html><geo_latitude><![CDATA[34.074]]></geo_latitude><geo_longitude><![CDATA[-118.399]]></geo_longitude></oembed>