<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[alexdanco.com]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://alexdanco.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Alex Danco]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://alexdanco.com/author/adanco/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Publications and Vanity Metrics: an&nbsp;update]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I talked a few posts ago about how <a title="Publications and Vanity Metrics" href="http://alexdanco.com/2013/10/15/publications-and-vanity-metrics/" target="_blank">scientific publications might be vanity metrics in disguise</a>&#8211; good for showing an illusion of progress, but the enemy of true breakthroughs. Here&#8217;s a quick update to that thought: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Higgs" target="_blank">Peter Higgs</a>, the British physicist whose work was the foundation behind the recent discovery of the subatomic particle bearing his name (the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson" target="_blank">Higgs Boson</a>) and who I mentioned in that post, might agree.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/06/peter-higgs-boson-academic-system" target="_blank">Speaking recently</a> with the British newspaper The Guardian, Higgs expressed his belief that &#8220;no university would employ him in today&#8217;s academic system because he would not be considered &#8216;productive&#8217; enough.&#8221; Higgs is also quoted as expressing doubt that a similar breakthrough [to his work on the Higgs Boson] could be achieved today, due to the pressure to publish.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/06/peter-higgs-boson-academic-system" target="_blank">The full article can be found here from The Guardian&#8217;s website</a>. Please read it.</p>
<p>I wonder if there are any researchers alive today who can match the impact-per-publication of Peter Higgs. Somehow I doubt it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></html></oembed>