<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Ballastexistenz]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Mel Baggs]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/author/ameliabaggs/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Autistic Pride Day &#8212; and taking things&nbsp;personally.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>June 18th is apparently <a href="http://www.autisticprideday.com/">Autistic Pride Day</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s come to my attention that the people who initially put it together think that there&#8217;s been some kind of collossal snub [edit:  Amy says they didn&#8217;t say &#8220;colossal snub&#8221;, but I was told they thought it was something negative towards them at any rate] on the part of autistics.org, in that we didn&#8217;t announce it last year on our front page, and Joel Smith wrote <a href="http://www.autistics.org/library/autpride2005.html">an article about his reservations towards the way some autistic people conceptualize autistic pride</a>.</p>
<p>So just to clear that up:</p>
<p>Last year on June 18th, one of the webmasters of autistics.org was in the midst of a 3100-mile move, others were preparing for Autreat, and another was sick in bed with an infection of some sort. I can&#8217;t speak for the others, but at the time, Autistic Pride Day was barely making a blip on my personal radar screen. It was just one of a whole lot of events and such that people were talking about. And, just for more fun, we were experiencing a website outage.</p>
<p>As far as Joel was concerned, I&#8217;m not going to claim to read his mind, but I&#8217;m going to hazard a guess from what I know of him. Joel, like me, is very concerned about a false form of &#8220;autistic pride&#8221; that is really merely &#8220;pride for some auties at the expense of others&#8221;. The kind of &#8220;pride&#8221; that allows Temple Grandin to say that she&#8217;d rather non-speaking auties not exist, but auties like her are okay and beneficial to society.</p>
<p>I doubt he knew much, if anything, about who was putting on Autistic Pride Day, and the reservations were probably of a more general nature. The notion of &#8220;I hope this isn&#8217;t yet another form of disability pride that&#8217;s founded on fundamentally ableism principles&#8221; is one that tends to cross my mind when presented with any form of &#8220;disability pride&#8221;. I kno someone who was surprised to find out that among many wheelchair users, &#8220;disability pride&#8221; was actually some variant on &#8220;At least I&#8217;m not retarded.&#8221; As someone involved in several disability communities, I know that many do have ableist versions of &#8220;pride&#8221;, this is not something made up to spite a particular person.</p>
<p>(Unfortunately, the opinion Joel voices is one that often gets wrongly condensed into the notion of &#8220;We shouldn&#8217;t talk about our strengths,&#8221; which is not, I think, what he&#8217;s saying at all.)</p>
<p>So, no, nobody on autistics.org was insulting any particular person who put on Autistic Pride Day by either failing to mention it on our front page (we don&#8217;t mention everything in the world on our front page anyway), or by the article Joel wrote.</p>
<p>Unless, of course, anyone celebrating on Autistic Pride Day <em>did</em> turn out to be doing the things Joel wrote about, but given that I don&#8217;t think he knew anyone putting it on, he wasn&#8217;t talking about any particular person involved in it, and wasn&#8217;t trying to undermine the whole day. It was in fact my impression, reading the article, that he was in fact attempting to <em>enhance</em> Autistic Pride Day by providing discussion of what were good and bad ways to celebrate being autistic.</p>
<p>So as tempting as it might be to consider oneself to be under extreme attack by reading a whole lot that wasn&#8217;t said into that article and into our silence, there was no attack, extreme or otherwise, there. You&#8217;re not dealing with hostility, you&#8217;re dealing with (mostly) some combination of incapacitation, being busy, unawareness, and indifference, as well as enough experience in the autistic community to know that &#8220;autistic pride&#8221; can be done both well and badly and to desire that it be done well instead of badly.</p>
<p>So, again, no snubbing is or was going on here. It might be useful to make fewer assumptions, though. I find it very strange that failing to link to something would be considered an attack in the first place. If I thought that anyone who didn&#8217;t link to autistics.org was attacking us, even if I limited this to the autistic community I&#8217;d be imagining myself a lot of non-existent enemies. This aspect of things reminds me of people in the offline world who think that by failing to notice or talk to them I&#8217;m being stuck-up or rude, when really I am processing them as a bunch of moving shapes and incapable of conversational speech.</p>
<p>So consider this my announcement of Autistic Pride Day, and my explanation of why what some people apparently think they saw, wasn&#8217;t actually there in the first place. I don&#8217;t know a lot about Autistic Pride Day, even still, so I can&#8217;t really point out what it is or anything, but it&#8217;s out there.</p>
]]></html></oembed>