<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Ballastexistenz]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Mel Baggs]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/author/ameliabaggs/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Autistic Aug Comm&nbsp;Users]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to put together a page of links to stuff (webpages and books) written by autistic people who use augmentative communication (at least a good chunk of the time, even when not always). The motivation behind this is similar to my motivation behind putting together the <a href="http://www.autistics.org/library/booklist.html">Autistic Authors Booklist</a>, which was largely because people were always acting like only three autistic authors existed and it was getting really tiresome when I had books by easily dozens, and also because people were under the impression that vastly more female than male authors existed which also turned out not to be the case.</p>
<p>In this case, I recently got a comment along the lines of, &#8220;So if you communicate by typing, where are the rest of the people like you?&#8221; And I realized I&#8217;d known people before who&#8217;d never heard of any auties who couldn&#8217;t speak having written any books.</p>
<p>There are a lot of them, with varying degrees of usable speech, varying times of acquiring speech, varying kinds of communication devices, varying levels of <em>loss</em> of speech, various levels of physical and/or emotional independence accessing communication devices, etc. And of course most of those can vary within one person, so there&#8217;s people who speak <em>and</em> type independently <em>and</em> use facilitated communication, and it can surprise people in which order some learned.</p>
<p><a href="http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?page_id=143">This is the permanent page on this blog I&#8217;m using for this at the moment.<br />
</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the list I&#8217;ve come up with so far.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m leaving a lot of people out. It was easiest to find FC users because of the FC Institute&#8217;s website having a lot of their writing. I know there&#8217;s others, as well as people who don&#8217;t use FC at all but use augmentative communication. I&#8217;d be interested in knowing who I missed (with links to their writing) so I can add them to that list, as well as any writing I&#8217;ve missed by the people on the list already.</p>
<p>And as reference, one thing I&#8217;m <em>not</em> doing is trying to say that this makes anyone more or less &#8220;really&#8221; autistic, more or less credible, or anything else. So I&#8217;m not too interested in engaging in either &#8220;This person doesn&#8217;t really type&#8221; discussions, <em>or</em> &#8220;Wow these are the real autistics and all those speaking kinds are just pretending or not as knowledgeable about autism&#8221; discussions. I hear enough of both of those the rest of the time. I get enough questions about whether I actually exist or not that I don&#8217;t want to do that to anyone else. And having read the writing of a lot of autistic people who&#8217;re regarded as all over the &#8220;spectrum&#8221;, I&#8217;ve seen what I regard as both clueful and clueless stuff both coming from all over people&#8217;s perceived positions on said landscape. So no need to say that I&#8217;m going to disregard all people who communicate in X, Y, or Z fashion.</p>
]]></html></oembed>