<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Ballastexistenz]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Mel Baggs]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/author/ameliabaggs/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Joel&#8217;s site move, and his &#8220;Autistic Professionals&#8221; post.]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Joel&#8217;s website and blog have both moved.</p>
<p>His website is now <a href="http://www.thiswayoflife.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thiswayoflife.org/</a></p>
<p>His blog is not <a href="http://www.thiswayoflife.org/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thiswayoflife.org/blog/</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t updated my links yet, but people should.  Particularly a lot of people have linked to this page:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thiswayoflife.org/murder.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thiswayoflife.org/murder.html</a></p>
<p>The old Geocities site will not be updated so it&#8217;s important to update that link.  (Again, not that I&#8217;ve got around to it yet.)</p>
<p>His current blog post, <a href="http://thiswayoflife.org/blog/?p=31">You Can be Autistic or a Professional, but Not Both</a> also interests me. It&#8217;s about how when autistic people are professionals, non-autistic people in autism circles are more likely to view auties as just &#8220;talking from their own personal experience&#8221; and discounting any particular expertise they actually had to learn.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a lot like what happens to Michelle Dawson. Never mind that she&#8217;s an autism researcher with an interest in ethics, people still think she&#8217;s speaking only from personal experience as an autistic person, and still try to paint the issue in terms of what kind of autistic person she is (or is not).</p>
<p>And while I&#8217;m not a professional, I do have a particular interest in certain areas of ethics, politics, and history. I&#8217;ve known a few autistic people very well, and a lot of autistic people at least a little. I&#8217;ve read any book that I can get my hands on by an autistic person. I&#8217;ve known autistic people from all over the so-called spectrum in any number of settings. I&#8217;ve participated in advocacy efforts within the disability rights movement, the psychiatric survivor/ex-patient movement, and the autistic community. While I&#8217;m not officially recognized for any of this, it accumulates into a wide-ranging bunch of knowledge that sits in the back of my head and informs everything I do.</p>
<p>Yet when I talk about autism or disability rights in general, people quickly reduce everything I&#8217;m saying to a product of my own experience and only my own experience. They brush aside and ignore all that other experience and the wide variety of worldviews I&#8217;ve been exposed to, and assume that every ethical discussion I get into is rooted in my experience and mine alone, or even my real or imagined neurotype in the so-called spectrum and mine alone, rather than my opinions having any merit for other reasons.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not just professionals we don&#8217;t get to be. It&#8217;s anything that acknowledges our ability to gain significant knowledge from outside our own experiences. And people say <em>we</em> are the ones who can&#8217;t take others&#8217; perspectives.</p>
]]></html></oembed>