After sitting on the counter for a day, the dough is divided in preparation for rolling out. I ended up dividing it into fourths because my rolling surface is so limited.

The dough was fairly sticky and difficult to work with, so I ended up working a good bit of extra flour into the cookies as I rolled and cut them. The recipe calls for rolling to 1/8″ thickness, so I was able to use my 1/8″ spacers, but on a tapered rolling pin like the one I have, that doesn’t leave a lot of usable width. I should probably switch to a straight pin like all the cool bakers are using now. (I bought the French-style tapered pin back when those were the cool thing.) As a result, I ended up with lots of flour on the surface of the cookies:

Twelve Braunekuchen on a sheet of baking parchment, with excess flour used during rolling making white spots on the surface of the cookies.

There’s not a huge variety of shapes; I had to look around for something that wasn’t the standard Wilton “box of 100 cheap plastic children’s cookie cutters” that the stores seemed to be full of. I got a set of six metal cookie cutters: a moon, two stars, a flower, a heart, and a parallelogram with scalloped edges. Even with just a few cookie cutters, I was reminded of what a PITA rolled cookies like these are; the biggest difficulty is always getting the “figure” free of the “ground” without tearing or leaving a mess on the work surface. (Maybe I would have had an easier time using a silicone mat.) The recipe made about 45 cookies (counting the uncooked dough that I ate because it wasn’t worth rolling out again). Here’s a close-up of a single finished cookie:

I made more hearts and stars than anything else.

After all that, how were they? Kinda “enh”: they were certainly crisp and brown, as the recipe claims, but the flavor left a lot to be desired in my book. Perhaps my spices were too old? Or maybe I overbaked them? It’s hard to tell. But I don’t feel any inclination to try again; there are other holiday desserts I could make that I would enjoy vastly more that take less work (or less fiddly work, at any rate).

Now on to part two of this post, which is the cheese souffle from January’s Cook’s Illustrated. The test cooks actually worked pretty hard to make this recipe much less fiddly than traditional souffles, although I’d hesitate to call it “foolproof”; the cheese-sauce base is totally standard, but the mixing process is much more aggressive than most recipes call for. I actually put off doing this so that I could get the Emile Henry two-quart (two-liter?) souffle dish that they recommended. For the cheese, I used Emmi Kaltbach Gruyere. The result was pretty good: the souffle rose as expected (despite not being coddled like a premature baby), and it had a rich, robust Swiss-cheesy flavor. Of course, as soon as it was out of the oven, it started deflating, a process which accelerated when I took my serving out:

About ten minutes out of the oven, and the souffle has already deflated nearly two inches from its original height!

Having done it this way, I wouldn’t mind having a variant recipe that used single-serving souffle dishes, so that the leftovers could be reheated easily to bring that poof back. I doubt that this one can just be heated to reinflate it after having a portion removed.

Nutrition data — Braunekuchen

Nutrition data — cheese souffle