<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Occasionally Coherent]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.bimajority.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Garrett Wollman]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.bimajority.org/author/garrettwollman/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Recipe quick takes: sandwich bread and slow-roasted pork&nbsp;chops]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>In accordance with my pledge from earlier this year, I made two new recipes recently, a whole-wheat sandwich bread I printed out ages ago from King Arthur Flour, and the &#8220;deviled&#8221; pork chops from next month&#8217;s issue of <cite>Cook&#8217;s Illustrated</cite>.</p>
<p>First the bread.  The recipe is entitled &#8220;Organic Whole Wheat Sandwich Bread&#8221; is one of a number I printed out several years ago (copyright 2007!) when I was developing my own whole-wheat sandwich bread.  It&#8217;s no longer available on their Web site, so far as I can tell, and my printout doesn&#8217;t have a URL I can look up in the Wayback Machine, but the the formula is very similar to one titled &ldquo;<a href='https://www.kingarthurflour.com/recipes/a-smaller-100-whole-wheat-pain-de-mie-recipe'>A Smaller 100% Whole Wheat Pain de Mie</a>&rdquo;, but not baked in a lidded loaf pan, and with more fat.  So far as I know, I had never done this recipe before, and it has some good and bad points.  On the good side, it&#8217;s very soft; the added fat, milk powder, and potato starch all combine to ensure that.  On the bad side, it&#8217;s very soft, and tears easily when slicing or attempting to spread peanut butter or jam.  It&#8217;s also quite high-calorie: two thin (&frac12;&nbsp;in or 12&nbsp;mm) slices add up to 275 kcal (minus a little bit for whatever carbs the yeast ate), compared with similar-sized commercial whole-wheat breads which tip the scale at 220 kcal.  On the positive side, with all that carbohydrate it toasts very well, and would probably make a good whole-wheat <em>pain perdu</em> or Texas toast.  I probably wouldn&#8217;t make it again.</p>
<p>The second is the pork chops.  This comes from the &#8220;May &amp; June 2018&#8221; issue of <cite>Cook&#8217;s Illustrated</cite> (pp.&nbsp;10&ndash;11) and I think it&#8217;s the first thing I&#8217;ve made from the magazine since Christopher Kimball&#8217;s partners fired him as editor-in-chief.  I actually didn&#8217;t make the magazine version, but rather &ldquo;<a href='https://www.cooksillustrated.com/recipes/10954-deviled-pork-chops-for-two'>Deviled Pork Chops for Two</a>&rdquo;, an online-only extra based on the four-serving magazine recipe.  This was quite simple to do, as it merely involves toasting some panko in melted butter, making a flavorful seasoning paste, and using the latter to glue the former to some pork chops.  I found while doing this that I had mistakenly defrosted a pair of strip steaks rather than pork loin chops I thought I had, but luckily, my quarterly meat delivery had brought me some pork sirloin chops that I could speed-defrost in the microwave, and this recipe calls for the sort of low-and-slow cooking that pork sirloin requires.  (Unlike the loin, pork &#8220;sirloin&#8221; is composed of a few different muscles, and does not respond well to fast, high-heat cooking methods like saut&eacute;eing.)  The recipe is simple enough that I did not bother to enter it as a &#8220;recipe&#8221; in my nutrition app; I just recorded the pork, mustard, panko, and butter (the four highest-calorie ingredients) individually.  Recommended.</p>
]]></html></oembed>