<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Future of&nbsp;Terrorism]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>The July issue of Discover Magazine has an excellent article on <a href="http://www.discover.com/issues/jul-06/cover/" target="_blank" title="" />The Future of Terrorism</a>.  You should readthe whole thing, online or in hardcopy.  Here are some choice quotes by people interviewed for the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The war on terrorism is really a proxy for saying what is really a war on militant Islam. If we can&#8217;t confront the ideology, if you&#8217;re not willing to take on the ideology and try to develop a reformist, moderate Islam that makes militant Islam a fringe element, we haven&#8217;t much hope to stamp it out.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Andrew C. McCarthy, former federal prosecutor who led the case against Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;A nuclear terrorism attack is inevitable if we continue on the autopilot path we&#8217;re on.&#8221;  The odds of a nuclear attack on U.S. soil in the next five years are &#8220;51-49.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Graham Allison, assistant secretary of defense in the first Clinton administration and now director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I&#8217;m less worried about terrorists becoming biologists than biologists becoming terrorists&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Gerald Epstein, senior fellow at the Homeland Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s easy to go around whipping up hysteria. I&#8217;m not a terrorism expert, but they seem to favor things that blow up and make loud noises rather than subtle increases in deaths from infectious agents.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Biologist Craig Venter, who is skeptical of the bioterrorism threat.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The current leadership of the terrorist organizations are of a generation that doesn&#8217;t trust cyber means of attack. Once we see a new generation of leadership that is more comfortable with technology, we&#8217;re going to see more of this.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Mike Skroch, Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;You can never get a fingerprint online, but you can get a writeprint.&#8221; If there is a new message, I can tell you if it&#8217;s from Bin Laden or his lieutenant.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Hsinchun Chen, designer of the Dark Web Project</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Do I think we&#8217;ll ever stop it?  Could we get it to a manageable level?  I think we can do that.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Howard Safir, former New York City police commissioner</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We know from the basis of past periods of terrorism that they don&#8217;t last forever.  This is a phenomenon, as troubling as it is, that will turn out to have a beginning, middle, and end.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael Barkun, political scientist at the Maxwell School in    Syracuse, New York</p>
<blockquote><p>The most advanced technology that terrorists have at their disposal is television.  &#8220;Essentially, it&#8217;s an image war. PR is everything in terrorism. Why? Look at what the terrorists are trying to achieve: political or ideological change. And if people don&#8217;t buy into a doctrine, the terrorists can&#8217;t succeed.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Graham Dillon, heads the financial-crime advisory service of the London branch of the accounting firm KPMG</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There would be such enormous pressure for an immediate and devastating political response. Three Algerians from Paris blow up a bomb in Washington; we vaporize Tehran and get rid of everybody we don&#8217;t like: anyone who&#8217;s strategically culpable, whom we believe either supports terrorism [or] sponsors it directly or indirectly. If that happens, the world would be as different a place as after World War II.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Scott Atran, an anthropologist at the University of Michigan and at the National Center for Scientific Research in Paris</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;You can do preventative things.  And you can make people safer. You can&#8217;t make people safe. You are never safe, because in an open and free society you&#8217;re always vulnerable to people who are extreme.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Howard Safir</p>
]]></html></oembed>