<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[It&#8217;s Conservatism, Stupid!]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Again, an article echoing <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2006/06/obligatory_reading_of_the_day_3.php" target="_blank" title="" />Lakoff&#8217;s</a> argument, with which I agree:<br />
<a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/37947/" target="_blank" title="" />Why Conservatives Can&#8217;t Govern</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If leaders consistently depart in disastrous ways from their underlying political ideology, there comes a point where one has to stop just blaming the leaders and start questioning the ideology.<br />
The collapse of the Bush presidency, in other words, is not just due to Bush&#8217;s incompetence (although his administration has been incompetent beyond belief). Nor is it a response to the president&#8217;s principled lack of intellectual curiosity and pitbull refusal to admit mistakes (although those character flaws are certainly real enough). And the orgy of bribery and special-interest dispensation in Congress is not the result of Tom DeLay&#8217;s ruthlessness, as impressive a bully as he was. This conservative presidency and Congress imploded, not despite their conservatism, but because of it.</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>