<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Pluto and other characters from&nbsp;Duckburg]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>If you go to the ScienceBlogs <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/" target="_blank" title="" />front page</a> you will see that The Buzz word of the day is Pluto.  And when there is a new Buzz Word, a lot of us tend to post about it &#8211; see <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/cgi-bin/MT/mt-search.cgi?Template=combinedSearch&amp;search=Pluto&amp;x=12&amp;y=9" target="_blank" title="" />how many already</a> chimed in on the topic.<br />
I am actually quite happy to see the revisions of the definition of a planet.  The old 9-planet system was just too neat and clear-cut, too iconic, to fixed and unmovable.<br />
Let&#8217;s jolt the masses out of the lull and show them the way science moves and changes and shatters our most valued beliefs!<br />
Twelve planets today, twelve thousand planets tomorrow, twelve million planets in OUR OWN Solar system in a century?  Why not?  That would redefine what a &#8220;solar system&#8221; is and replace simplicity with complexity which, IMHO, is a good thing for everyone to learn to deal with.<br />
For more information, John McKay provides <a href="http://johnmckay.blogspot.com/2006/08/reprieve-for-pluto-revisiting-one-of.html" target="_blank" title="" />the history</a> and Phil Plait gives the scientific <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2006/08/15/congratulations-its-a-planet/" target="_blank" title="" />details</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>