<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Blogs and Science&nbsp;Communication]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>As a scientist and a blogger and someone very interested in <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2006/08/science_blogging_what_it_can_b.php" target="_blank" title="" />science communication</a>, I was quite delighted with Rob HelpyChalk&#8217;s <a href="http://helpychalk.blogspot.com/2006/09/scientific-communication.html" target="_blank" title="" />series of three charts</a> depicting traditional communication between scientists, traditional communication between scientists and general population, and the new two-way communication between scientists and general population (here is the third chart):<br />
<img alt="science%20communication.jpg" src="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/clock/upload/2006/09/science%20communication.jpg" width="500" height="475" /><br />
<a href="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2006/09/headsup_2.php" target="_blank" title="" />Bill</a> and <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/09/needs_more_arrows.php" target="_blank" title="" />PZ</a> have some comments on the chart as well. Leave your comments on Rob&#8217;s blog.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/clock/upload/2006/09/science%20communication.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>