<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Chemistry Nobel is really a Biology&nbsp;Nobel]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Roger D. Kornberg got a <a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/2006/press.html" target="_blank" title="">chemistry</a> Nobel Prize this year for figuring out one of the most basic processes in all of biology, stuff we <a href="http://themagicschoolbus.blogspot.com/2006/05/protein-synthesis-transcription-and.html" target="_blank" title="">teach in intro classes</a> &#8211; DNA transcription, i.e., how the cell &#8220;reads&#8221; the DNA code and synthesizes messenger RNA molecules that are used as templates for synthesis of proteins.  Excellent choice from my perspective of a biologist.  But what do the chemists think?<br />
Also, is this the first instance of a parent and the child both getting a Nobel (his father got one four decades ago for DNA replication)?</p>
]]></html></oembed>