<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[EurekAlert disses blogs]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/" target="_blank" title="">EurekAlert</a> which is run by <a href="http://www.aaas.org/" target="_blank" title="">AAAS</a> is a useful and timely (though not <a href="http://www.geneticsandhealth.com/2007/03/06/genetics-news-from-eurekalert/" target="_blank" title="">foolproof</a>) source of science news that many science bloggers use to keep up to date on what&#8217;s new.  However, they seem to be behind the curve in at least one way &#8211; they categorically do not disembargo the papers to <a href="http://www.geneticsandhealth.com/2007/03/07/genetics-blogging-is-illegitimate/" target="_blank" title="">blogs of any kind</a>, not even blogs affiliated with scientific or journalistic organizations. How do they think they will start entering the 21st century and remain competitive?</p>
]]></html></oembed>