<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Open Laboratory and science&nbsp;blogging]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Attila (read the entire transcript of <a href="http://pimm.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/uncensored-gmail-chat-between-2-science-bloggers-on-adult-issues" target="_blank" title="">our chat</a>) alerted me to a new <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v447/n7146/full/447779b.html" target="_blank" title="">book review</a> of &#8216;<a href="http://www.lulu.com/content/631016" target="_blank" title="">The Open Science 2006</a>&#8216; science blogging anthology.<br />
<a href="http://neurophilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/open-laboratory-reviewed-in-nature/" target="_blank" title="">MC</a> and <a href="http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2007/06/openlab_2006_re.html" target="_blank" title="">Reed</a> have already blogged about the review.<br />
Let me know what you think.  And keep the submissions for the 2007 edition <a href="http://openlab.wufoo.com/forms/submission-form/" target="_blank" title="">flowing in</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>