<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Obligatory Readings of the Day &#8211; competition vs cooperation in&nbsp;science]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Four excellent, thought-provoking articles all in some way related to the idea of Open Science.  One by Bill Hooker:<br />
<a href="http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2007/07/competition-in-.html" target="_blank" title="">Competition in science: too much of a good thing</a><br />
and three by Janet Stemwedel:<br />
<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/ethicsandscience/2007/07/post_5.php" target="_blank" title="">Clarity and obfuscation in scientific papers</a><br />
<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/ethicsandscience/2007/07/porush.php" target="_blank" title="">Does thinking like a scientist lead to bad science writing?</a><br />
<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/ethicsandscience/2007/07/openwetware.php" target="_blank" title="">OpenWetWare</a></p>
]]></html></oembed>