<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Social Networking for Scientists, Part&nbsp;N]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>It seems everyone is talking about social networking sites these days.  There are interesting thoughts on <a href="http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/rpg/2008/05/25/on-the-nature-of-networking" target="_blank" title="">Richard Grant&#8217;s</a> and <a href="http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/05/26/a-new-social-network-for-scientists-oh-boy/" target="_blank" title="">David Crotty&#8217;s</a> blogs (read the comment threads as well).  Many of those sites will die, others will adapt, but most, I think, will play a supporting role in a whole network of services surrounding&#8230;the actual scientific papers.  For instance, surrounding <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/05/oa-journals-as-social-networks.html" target="_blank" title="">TOPAZ-based PLoS papers</a>, perhaps organized into Hubs.  And papers from other journals that join into the system. Thoughts?</p>
]]></html></oembed>