<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Open Access, but not&nbsp;really]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes people ask me what do I have against Green OA (repositories) as opposed to Gold OA (journals) and I have a couple of stock answers to that, usually including a caveat that I do not really have anything against Green OA <em>per se</em>, but the way it is implemented is not good, yet makes people complacent, which in turn slows the down the progress towards complete OA.  Not well implemented?  Well, yes, I have seen <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/07/how-to-hide-oa-content-from-search.html" target="_blank" title="">all of these sins</a> over the past couple of years. Once there is a standard that all builders of repositories adher to, Green OA will be OK (though there are other arguments against its current implementation still standing, i.e., the usual 6-12 month wait which is not inherent to Green OA but just a current bad practice).</p>
]]></html></oembed>