<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Reviewing Peer-Review]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/11/reviewing_peerreview.php" target="_blank" title="">On the Seed Magazine site&#8230;</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>ScienceBloggers discuss the advantages of open science and debate the necessity of the current peer-review system.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nice!  But of course I&#8217;d say that.  Just to emphasize, in case the article does not make it clear enough, Open Access and changes in peer-review will both be a result of the Age of the Web, but the two are not necessarily tied to each other in each individual instance of a publishing venue.  Different journals, pre-print sites, etc., are experimenting with OA and with changes in peer-review in different ways and at different rates, the two processes being independent from each other at this stage in history.</p>
]]></html></oembed>