<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[A Blog Around The Clock]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://blog.coturnix.org]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Bora Zivkovic]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://blog.coturnix.org/author/coturnix/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[More on Pulitzers for online&nbsp;reporting]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Remember <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2008/12/pulitzers_for_online_reporting.php" target="_blank" title="">this</a>?<br />
Now <a href="http://bloggasm.com/" target="_blank" title="">Simon Ovens</a> interviewed several key players in this game &#8211; <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2008/12/pulitzers-open-to-online-only-entrants----but-who-qualifies347.html" target="_blank" title="">Pulitzers Open to Online-Only Entrants &#8212; But Who Qualifies?</a> It&#8217;s longish, but worth your attention:</p>
<blockquote><p>He did, however, confirm that a blog could hypothetically qualify. &#8220;If one or two people call their website a text-based newspaper, would it be eligible?&#8221; he said. &#8220;Blogs tend to fall into three categories. There are news reporting blogs, there are commentary blogs, and there&#8217;s a hybrid version of the two. If they&#8217;re text-based and meet our criteria, then they probably could compete. But it would be up to them to satisfy the criteria.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>